Illustration of a tug of war

Cutthroat competition: impact-led resource planning makes the difference

Fast-growing service organizations find themselves in an increasingly competitive market. Customers expect faster delivery, at lower costs and without compromising on quality. This pressure falls directly on the shoulders of operations managers and resource planners. How do you deliver faster and cheaper without sacrificing turnover and margin? The answer lies in a fundamentally different way of planning: impact-led resource planning.

 

The pressure of growth and competition

For many organizations, growth is no longer enough – profitable growth is the new watchword. At the same time, we see competition intensifying. New players are entering the market with smarter processes, digital tools and disruptive pricing models. To keep up, established organizations need to respond to customer demands faster, with less overhead, and with a keen eye on the financial health of projects.

But in this growth spurt, inefficiencies often creep in. More work often means hiring more people – internally or externally. That seems logical, but it entails risks: higher wage costs, lower margins, and a greater dependence on freelancers or expensive agencies. And if demand suddenly drops, you are left with an overcapacity that no one wants.

 

Working more efficiently is not a luxury, but a necessity

The key? Doing more work with the same capacity – without sacrificing quality or customer satisfaction. This requires smarter deployment of existing resources, greater visibility into future demand, and better decisions about where to allocate capacity.

Many organizations try to solve this with traditional resource planning. They plan hours, look back at what went wrong, and optimize the planning per team or department. But that is not enough. The world is changing too fast, the margins are too thin and the dependencies between teams are too big. What seems like a logical planning today can be outdated tomorrow.

 

The limitations of traditional planning

Traditional resource planning is often reactive. The focus is on allocating people to tasks, usually within silos such as consultancy, development or operations. The starting point is: how do we distribute the available hours as best as possible over the requested tasks?

But that model fails in an environment where speed, profitability and flexibility are key. Because what if your planning seems perfect at team level, but does not pay off at all at project level? Or if you have no insight into the margin of the project, because the available people are deployed, but are not the most profitable choice?

 

Think different: from hours to impact

This is where impact-led resource planning comes in. This is not a planning method in the traditional sense, but a strategic approach that links resource planning directly to the impact on the bottom line. It is no longer just about putting in hours, but about maximizing revenue, margin and long-term performance.

Impact-led planning looks ahead. It predicts the performance of projects based on current and expected resource deployment. It provides insight into which projects contribute to profit, which customers are structurally losing money, and where your capacity yields the most. And instead of optimizing per team, you optimize at company level: what is the effect of this planning on the total margin?

 

How does that work in practice?

Let’s say you have two projects starting in the same week. Project A is for a strategic client, has a high margin, but requires senior consultants. Project B is less profitable, but brings in revenue quickly. Traditional planning would divide those projects among available teams, without looking at the financial impact. Impact-led planning asks the question: which effort delivers the most value to the company as a whole?

You may decide to prioritize Project A and move Project B a bit or tackle it with a different composition. Or you may discover that it pays to free up an internal employee for Project A, because this will yield greater customer value in the long run. You can only make such choices if your resource planning looks not only at hours, but also at impact.

 

Conclusion: time for a new mindset

Impact-led resource planning provides your organization with:

  • Higher margins because you plan smarter based on profitability.
  • Better utilization because you prevent expensive people from being assigned to low-yield projects.
  • Gain more control over growth by looking ahead and proactively developing your resources.
  • Less external hiring because you make optimal use of existing people.
  • Faster delivery because you can anticipate and prevent bottlenecks sooner.

 
The world of service delivery has changed. Competition forces you to work faster, smarter and more profitably. You can only do this if you start thinking differently about resource planning. Away from the spreadsheet, away from team silos, and towards a data-driven approach that looks at impact.

Potential revenue increase